Flourishing: Why We Need Religion in a Globalized World

A celebrated theologian explores how the best hazards to humanity, in addition to the best offers for human flourishing, are on the intersection of faith and globalization

greater than nearly anything, globalization and the nice international religions are shaping our lives, affecting every little thing from the general public regulations of political leaders and the industrial judgements of bosses and staff, to school curricula, the entire technique to the internal longings of our hearts. quintessential to either globalization and religions are compelling, overlapping, and occasionally competing visions of what it potential to reside well.
during this perceptive, deeply own, and fantastically written publication, a number one theologian sheds mild on how religions and globalization have traditionally interacted and argues for what their dating must be. Recounting how those twinned forces have intersected in his personal lifestyles, he exhibits how global religions, regardless of their malfunctions, stay one among our so much effective resources of ethical motivation and comprise inside of them profoundly evocative money owed of human flourishing. Globalization may be judged through how good it serves us for residing out our genuine humanity as anticipated inside those traditions. via renewal and reform, religions may, in flip, form globalization in order that should be approximately greater than bread alone.

Show description

Preview of Flourishing: Why We Need Religion in a Globalized World PDF

Similar Theology books

Discovering God: The Origins of the Great Religions and the Evolution of Belief

Studying God is a huge heritage of the origins of the nice religions from the Stone Age to the fashionable Age. Sociologist Rodney Stark surveys the beginning and progress of religions round the world—from the prehistoric period of primal ideals; the historical past of the pyramids present in Iraq, Egypt, Mexico, and Cambodia; and the good "Axial Age" of Plato, Zoroaster, Confucius, and the Buddha, to the fashionable Christian missions and the worldwide unfold of Islam.

Fear and Trembling (Penguin Classics)

The notorious and arguable paintings that made an enduring impact on either smooth Protestant theology and existentialist philosophers akin to Sartre and CamusWriting less than the pseudonym of "Johannes de silentio," Kierkegaard expounds his own view of faith via a dialogue of the scene in Genesis during which Abraham prepares to sacrifice his son Isaac at God's command.

Ecclesiastical History of the English People (Penguin Classics)

'With God's aid, I, Bede . .. have assembled those evidence in regards to the heritage of the Church in Britain . .. from the traditions of our forebears, and from my very own own knowledge'Written in advert 731, Bede's Ecclesiastical background of the English People is the 1st account of Anglo-Saxon England ever written, and continues to be our unmarried Most worthy resource for this era.

Bonaventure (Great Medieval Thinkers)

The nice Franciscan theologian St. Bonaventure (c. 1217-74) engaged in philosophy in addition to theology, and the relation among the 2 in Bonaventure's paintings has lengthy been debated. but, few reports were dedicated to Bonaventure's concept as a complete. during this survey, Christopher M. Cullen finds Bonaventure as an outstanding synthesizer, whose procedure of idea bridged the distance among theology and philosophy.

Additional resources for Flourishing: Why We Need Religion in a Globalized World

Show sample text content

One of the such a lot influential theological formulations of the order of priorities is Augustine’s doctrine of “the order of affection” (ordo amoris). In De Doctrina Christiana (On Christian Doctrine), Augustine distinguishes 4 different types of issues which are to be enjoyed: that that is above us, ourselves, issues which are on an equivalent point as us, and issues underneath us (which for Augustine comprises our bodies). precedence is going to that that is above us (namely, God), through ourselves and our friends, who're equivalent to us, then via issues less than us (1. 23. 22). Augustine summarizes: “Now he's a guy of simply and holy lifestyles who kinds an unprejudiced estimate of items, and retains his affections additionally below strict keep watch over, in order that he neither loves what he ought to not love, nor fails to like what he should love, nor loves that extra which needs to be enjoyed much less, nor loves that both which must be enjoyed both much less or extra, nor loves that much less or extra which needs to be enjoyed both. No sinner is to be enjoyed as a sinner; and each guy is to be enjoyed as a guy for God’s sake; yet God is to be enjoyed for His personal sake. And if God is to be enjoyed greater than any guy, each one guy should love God greater than himself. Likewise we should love one other guy greater than our personal physique, simply because all issues are to be enjoyed in connection with God, and one other guy could have fellowship with us within the delight in God, while our physique can't; for the physique in simple terms lives during the soul, and it really is by way of the soul that we take pleasure in God” 1. 27. 28) the concept human loves has to be accurately ordered and that the affection of God takes precedence runs all through Augustine’s works (see, for instance, urban of God 15. 22). Augustine’s doctrine has generated a major volume of remark and debate. to call quite a few striking examples: Hannah Arendt, Love and St. Augustine, ed. Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott and Judith Chelius Stark (Chicago: collage of Chicago Press, 1996); Oliver O’Donovan, the matter of Self-Love in St. Augustine (New Haven: Yale college Press, 1980); Raymond Canning, The harmony of affection for God and Neighbor in St. Augustine (Leuven: Augustinian old Institute, 1993); Eric Gregory, Politics and the Order of affection: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship (Chicago: college of Chicago Press, 2008). forty five. one other instance is Socrates (though it really is slightly disputed even if his axial leap forward is to be defined as non secular; see José Casanova, “Religion, the Axial Age, and Secular Modernity in Bellah’s conception of non secular Evolution,” in Bellah and Joas, The Axial Age, 205). He insisted on and embodied the primacy of common moral rules (“obeying God”) over pursuing the products of standard existence, even over protecting his personal existence. He wasn’t prepared to sacrifice advantage even on discomfort of being condemned to loss of life for calling into query the gods of the country and hence, from the viewpoint of its representatives, undermining its thriving (see Apology). or even notwithstanding he believed that he used to be condemned falsely, he used to be unwilling to flee from legal whilst provided the chance simply because his rules (which integrated obedience to the country, even though the denial of the then frequent floor of its legitimacy) wouldn't let it, and he could fairly sacrifice his existence than his moral rules (see Crito).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.73 of 5 – based on 25 votes