Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze (Cultural Memory in the Present)

By Knox Peden

Spinoza Contra Phenomenology essentially recasts the background of postwar French idea, more often than not presumed to were pushed via a critique of cause indebted to Nietzsche and Heidegger. even if the reception of phenomenology gave upward push to many leading edge advancements in French philosophy, from existentialism to deconstruction, now not everybody in France was once proud of this German import. This booklet recounts how a sequence of French philosophers used Spinoza to erect a bulwark opposed to the nominally irrationalist traits of phenomenology. From its beginnings within the interwar years, this rationalism could end up foundational for Althusser's rethinking of Marxism and Deleuze's formidable metaphysics. there was a renewed enthusiasm for Spinozism of overdue via those that see his paintings as a type of neo-vitalism or philosophy of lifestyles and impact. Peden counters this development by means of monitoring a decisive and ignored point of Spinoza's philosophy—his rationalism—in a physique of suggestion too usually presumed to have rejected cause. within the method, he demonstrates that the virtues of Spinoza's rationalism have not begun to be exhausted.

Show description

Preview of Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze (Cultural Memory in the Present) PDF

Similar Phenomenology books

Psychology: Perspectives and Connections, 3rd Edition

Demanding Assumptions. simply because we “think” whatever doesn’t make it actual. Feist’s available method of technology is helping scholars problem their assumptions, comprehend study, and realize that during Psychology, it’s no longer all black and white. almost all scholars input Introductory Psychology with preconceived notions―many of them wrong.

Phenomenology of Spirit

This fabulous research of the phases within the mind's beneficial development from rapid sense-consciousness to the location of a systematic philosophy comprises an introductory essay and a paragraph-by-paragraph research of the textual content to assist the reader comprehend this such a lot tough and so much influential of Hegel's works.

Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind

Philosophical paintings at the brain flowed in streams in the course of the twentieth century: phenomenology and analytic philosophy. This quantity goals to carry them jointly back, by means of demonstrating how paintings in phenomenology could lead to major development on difficulties significant to present analytic examine, and the way analytical philosophy of brain might make clear phenomenological issues.

Additional resources for Spinoza Contra Phenomenology: French Rationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze (Cultural Memory in the Present)

Show sample text content

Fifty two And Althusser’s archive comprises notebooks that exhibit he used to be acquainted with Cavaillès’s doctoral works at a comparatively younger age. fifty three The martyred Resistant’s mythic prestige should have performed a different position in his charm. He used to be the main extremely popular normalien of his new release, philosophically, and his heroism was once mythical. His antipathy towards the existentialist version of phenomenology was once renowned, and his extra technical grievances with Husserl’s undertaking have been legible in his released texts. Canguilhem by no means made a mystery of his excessive regard for Cavaillès. whilst his edited model of Sur los angeles logique et l. a. théorie de l. a. technology seemed in 1946, the slogan that pitted a philosophy of the concept that opposed to a philosophy of recognition speedy grew to become universal foreign money within the Latin region. fifty four Althusser’s courting with Martin could provide extra gentle. In his memoir, Althusser attributes his discovery of Cavaillès and Canguilhem, “two thinkers to whom I essentially owe everything,” to Martin. fifty five We observed Martin past as enigmatic simply because little or no is understood approximately him past the main points recorded through Althusser himself and people found via Althusser’s biographer. we all know that they have been first-class neighbors within the years on the ENS following the warfare. We additionally be aware of that Althusser thought of his friend’s suicide in 1963 to be a crucial occasion in his personal existence. Althusser’s significant autobiography is extremely suspect when it comes to info and interpretation. yet Moulier Boutang has urged that there's a few reason for Althusser’s insistence that he had in impact pursued Martin’s personal highbrow itinerary for him, that's, in lieu of him. The proof for this lies, in keeping with Moulier Boutang, in Martin’s thesis on Hegel, which is still unpublished and unavailable to the general public. In it we it appears discover a entire set of matters mobilized, leader between them a examining of Hegel that emphasised the person as an impression of a conglomeration of forces, an idea of overdetermination truly anticipatory of Althusser’s, and the valuable mainly to force to the center of Hegel’s “problematic” (problèmatique). fifty six This time period, like “overdetermination,” may emerge as a key-phrase for Althusser. Althusser’s debt to Martin was once poignantly captured within the commitment to For Marx: “These pages are devoted to the reminiscence of Jacques Martin, the good friend who, within the such a lot bad ordeal, by myself came upon the line to Marx’s philosophy—and guided me directly to it. ” One presumes the ordeal mentioned this is the melancholy that culminated in his friend’s suicide. fifty seven we'll by no means recognize the precise nature of Martin’s “discovery. ” Althusser claimed Martin “taught [him] how you can imagine [. . . ]. with no [Martin], [he] may by no means have positioned recommendations jointly. ”58 it'd be tendentious to indicate that Martin’s discovery used to be Cavaillès’s philosophy, yet we will not less than garner from the main points we do comprehend, which incorporated a shared admiration for Cavaillès and a omit for Merleau-Ponty, what sort of philosopher Martin used to be and what his effect on Althusser could have been.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.09 of 5 – based on 25 votes